As President Trump delays the transition process, the teams of Biden and Harris are actively preparing for post-election activities. Former President Trump’s actions deviate from established norms, potentially impacting national security. Biden and Harris, however, are pushing forward with strategic planning, underscoring the critical nature of this political transition.
The delay in the presidential transition process could have significant consequences for national security. With critical days approaching, the lack of formal transition agreements between Trump’s team and the federal government poses risks to a smooth transition of power. Max Stier of the Partnership for Public Service highlights the optional nature of such activities, warning of jeopardy to the country without engagement.
Transition planning, guided by the White House Office of Management and Budget and the General Services Administration, began early. Each campaign needs to sign a memorandum with the GSA for access to essential resources, yet Trump’s team remains unsigned and lagging in submitting ethics plans.
Biden’s administration initiated transition preparations back in 2023, appointing a senior career official to liaise with candidates. From monthly meetings to detailed memos for federal agencies, the groundwork has been laid for the transition. The strategy involves comprehensive briefing materials to enlighten the next administration about the state of affairs.
The current administration’s transition tactics draw lessons from previous election cycles. Comparatively, in 2008, the Bush-Obama briefings set a precedent for effective transitions. However, officials remember waiting in vain for engagement from Trump’s team.
Agencies must stand ready to provide resources to both Trump and Harris teams, should results remain uncertain. Valerie Boyd from the Partnership for Public Service stresses equal access to information, supporting both parties during transitions.
In contrast, Harris might opt for continuity, retaining current political appointees for stabilisation. Despite potential Senate hurdles, Harris plans to appoint a Republican to her cabinet, illustrating a bi-partisan approach.
The transition process during this election cycle is fraught with complexities. While some plans remain uncertain, others are meticulously prepared. Ensuring readiness, regardless of election outcomes, remains a priority for all involved.
The ongoing delays in the presidential transition process bring potential risks but also highlight the importance of robust planning. As both campaigns navigate this pivotal phase, the focus remains on safeguarding national interests and ensuring a smooth transfer of power amidst political upheavals.
